Mr. Piyush Joshi Vs The Competition Commission Of India & Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal New Delhi 2 Jul 2019 TA (AT) (Competition) No. 32 Of 2017, Old Appeal No. 43 Of 2016 (2019) 07 NCLAT CK 0006
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

TA (AT) (Competition) No. 32 Of 2017, Old Appeal No. 43 Of 2016

Hon'ble Bench

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J; Bansi Lal Bhat, J

Advocates

Piyush Joshi, Gaurav Gupta, Navdeep Singh Suhag, Rajshekhar Rao, Anandh Vanakataramani, Sagardeep Rathi, Sakhsi Agarwal, Swati Bala

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Competition Act, 2002 - Section 4, 4(1), 5, 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 6(6), 6(7), 6(8), 15(b), 19, 20, 20(4), 26(2), 26(6), 27(2), 27(6), 28(2), 28(6), 29, 29(1), 29(1A), 29(2), 29(3), 29(4), 29(6), 30, 30(2), 30(2), 30(3), 30(4), 30(5), 30(6), 30(29), 31, 31(2), 31(2A), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(6), 31(8), 31(9), 32(2), 32(6), 33(2), 33(6), 38(2), 38(6), 39(2), 39(6), 42A, 43(2), 43(6), 43A(2), 43(6), 44(2), 44(6), 45(2), 45(6), 46(2), 46(6), 53A, 53A(a), 53A(1)(a), 53B, 53B(2), 53N, 53Q(2)
  • Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(23FB), 115AD
  • Competition Commission Of India (Procedure In Regard To The Transaction Of Business Relating To Combinations) Regulations, 2011 - Regulation 13(1B)

Judgement Text

Translate:
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Rajesh Shivhare Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others
22 Jan 2026
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Dharmendra Kansana Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh
22 Jan 2026
From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More
Quick Actions
Download PDF Open PDF in New Tab
Case Metadata
  • Ck Citation: (2019) 07 NCLAT CK 0006
  • Coram: S.J. Mukhopadhaya, J; Bansi Lal Bhat, J
  • Bench: Division Bench
  • Advocates: Piyush Joshi, Gaurav Gupta, Navdeep Singh Suhag, Rajshekhar Rao, Anandh Vanakataramani, Sagardeep Rathi, Sakhsi Agarwal, Swati Bala
  • Result: Dismissed
Referenced Acts & Sections
  • Competition Act, 2002 - Section 4, 4(1), 5, 5(a), 5(b), 5(c), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 6(6), 6(7), 6(8), 15(b), 19, 20, 20(4), 26(2), 26(6), 27(2), 27(6), 28(2), 28(6), 29, 29(1), 29(1A), 29(2), 29(3), 29(4), 29(6), 30, 30(2), 30(2), 30(3), 30(4), 30(5), 30(6), 30(29), 31, 31(2), 31(2A), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(6), 31(8), 31(9), 32(2), 32(6), 33(2), 33(6), 38(2), 38(6), 39(2), 39(6), 42A, 43(2), 43(6), 43A(2), 43(6), 44(2), 44(6), 45(2), 45(6), 46(2), 46(6), 53A, 53A(a), 53A(1)(a), 53B, 53B(2), 53N, 53Q(2)
  • Income-tax Act, 1961 - Section 10(23FB), 115AD
  • Competition Commission Of India (Procedure In Regard To The Transaction Of Business Relating To Combinations) Regulations, 2011 - Regulation 13(1B)
Stay Updated

Subscribe for weekly highlights on judgements, legal insights, and workflow tips.