Ritu And Another Vs State Of Haryana And Others

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 1 Jan 2020 Criminal Writ Petition No. 2713 Of 2019 (2020) 01 P&H CK 0279
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Writ Petition No. 2713 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

Raj Mohan Singh, J

Advocates

Manoj Kumar

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Raj Mohan Singh, J

1. In this petition, petitioners have prayed for issuance of necessary directions to the official respondents to protect their lives and personal liberties

from being invaded by the private respondents. Petitioners claimed themselves to be major and have contracted marriage on 27.12.2019 according to

their own sweet will, but against the wishes of their family members. Marriage certificate (Annexure P-3) and photographs of marriage (Annexure P-

4) are sought to be pressed into service in order to project validity of marriage.

2. In the context of threat perception at the hands of private respondents, petitioners have prayed for necessary directions for safeguarding their

personal civil and legal rights.

3. In the aforesaid context, petitioners have allegedly moved representation dated 27.12.2019 (Annexure P-5) to the Superintendent of Police, District

Kurukshetra and Station House Officer, Police Station, Pehowa District Kurukshetra.

4. Notice of motion to respondents No. 1 to 3.

5. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, AAG, Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of State-respondents No. 1 to 3.

6. At this juncture, this Court is not in a position to comment upon the validity of marriage and majority of the petitioners in terms of their respective

ages, however, respondent No. 2 can be asked to have a fair look on the grievance of the petitioners in order to ascertain veracity of allegations made

by the petitioners.

7. Respondent No. 2 would be at liberty to devise his/her own mechanism to ascertain the truth. He/she would also be at liberty to join the petitioners

or any other person acquainted with facts in issue. In case respondent No. 2 finds that there is some truth in the allegations of the petitioners, then

he/she shall proceed to take appropriate action in accordance with law.

8. The aforesaid order is being passed at this stage without meaning anything on the merits of the case. Respondent No. 2 would pass necessary order

without being influenced by any observation made by the Court in terms of pleadings at this stage. This order shall not debar the official respondents

from proceeding against any of the party in accordance with law in case they are involved in some other case. It would be appreciated if the

representation filed by the petitioners is decided within a period of one month from today keeping in view the threat perception shown by the

petitioners.

9. Petition stands disposed of accordingly.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More