Ravindra Taunk and Others Vs Smt. Vasanti B. Taunk and Others

Jharkhand High Court 12 Jan 2012 F.A. No. 863 of 1993 (R) (2012) 01 JH CK 0013
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

F.A. No. 863 of 1993 (R)

Hon'ble Bench

Poonam Srivastava, J

Acts Referred
  • Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC) - Order 23 Rule 1

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This appeal is listed "For Hearing" today. Parties are present.

2. It is brought to my notice that a cross-objection was filed at the instance of Respondent Nos. 5, 6 & 7 which was objected by the appellants. The cross-objection was rejected on 9th March, 2011. I am informed by Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate that this order is challenged before the Apex Court and the same is pending, therefore, the appeal can be heard only after the Hon''ble Supreme Court decides the matter.

3. Shri P.K. Prasad, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Ayush Aditya emphatically states that he is ready to withdraw his claim in respect of Item No. VII mentioned in the schedule and abandon his claim under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC and the appeal may be heard. In respect of other properties mentioned in the plaint once again Shri Indrajit Sinha brought to my notice, an order of this Court where the I.A. under Order XXIII Rule 1 C.P.C. was pressed but the Court passed an order that the appellants'' I.A. abandoning Item No. VII in the appeal shall be heard along with the appeal at the stage of final hearing.

4. In this peculiar facts and circumstances the only option left is that the appeal can be heard after the decision of the Apex Court.

5. There are a number of parties but the main contesting parties on the issue in question which is pending decision before the Apex Court are respondent Nos. 5, 6 & 7 vis. a vis. the appellant and the respondent No. 1. All the aforesaid parties are represented and are present in the Court today. The appellants have informed that they have put appearance, if not, they will file their appearance and get the matter finally adjudicated .

6. In the circumstances, parties undertake to make a request before the Hon''ble Supreme Court to decide the matter and do the needful.

7. I.A. No. 1811 of 2011 is kept pending.

8. Shri P.K. Prasad, Sr. Advocate has made a statement that in the event no decision is taken then his I.A. may be heard on a subsequent date.

9. As agreed between the parties, list this Appeal on 16th February, 2012 as 1st case for "Final Hearing/hearing of the I.A".

10. Let a copy of this order be handed over today to the Counsel for the parties.

From The Blog
India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Nov
18
2025

Court News

India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Read More
Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Nov
18
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Read More