Basudeo Mahto and Others Vs State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court 10 Mar 2004 Writ Petition (C) No. 382 of 2002 (2004) 03 JH CK 0013
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 382 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

Amareshswar Sahay, J

Advocates

V. Shivnath and A.K. Rashidi, for the Appellant; P. Modi, G.P.I., for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Amareshwar Sahay, J.@mdashHeard the parties.

2. The petitioners, who were the displaced persons on account of Punasi Reservoir Scheme in the district of Deoghar, have prayed for inclusion of their names in Category I of the Deoghar District displaced persons penal list dated 30.9.2001.

3. The State in their counter-affidavit has stated that in view of the new rehabilitation policy, the scheme framed by the Government of Bihar dated 18.9.1993 has lost its force and it is not valid at present and therefore, the prayer of the petitioners for placing them in Category I in place of Category II has become meaningless. It is further stated that under the new rehabilitation policy of the Government of Jharkhand, a fresh list of displaced persons of Punasi Reservoir scheme is being prepared and the benefits will be given to the displaced persons including the petitioners as per the new policy.

4. Since the petitioners are the displaced persons and the fresh list of displaced persons is being prepared by the State Government, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the State of Jharkhand to finalise the same within the period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. The writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Nov
22
2025

Court News

ITAT Mumbai Says Stock Write-Down Cannot Be Disallowed Without Evidence, Remands Case for Fresh Hearing
Read More
Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Nov
22
2025

Court News

Bombay High Court Rules Arbitrators Lose Mandate If Proceedings Are Suspended Over Fee Disputes
Read More