Rajneesh Mishra Vs Union of India and Others

Jharkhand High Court 6 Jan 2014 W.P. (PIL) Nos. 6141 of 2008 and 2913 of 2012 (2014) 01 JH CK 0086
Bench: Division Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

W.P. (PIL) Nos. 6141 of 2008 and 2913 of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

R. Banumathi, C.J; Aparesh Kumar Singh, J

Advocates

Delip Jerath, Sr. Adv, Advocate for the Appellant; Ajit Kumar, A.A.G., Sohail Anwar, Sr. Advocate and A.K. Pandey, Advocate for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed by the petitioner for removing of seal which is said to have been made pursuant to the order of this Court and also for recalling the order passed by this Court. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in I.A. No. 184 of 2013 submitted that I.A. No. 184 of 2013 pertains to W.P. (PIL) No. 1872 of 2010 and therefore, prays that I.A. No. 184 of 2013 be delinked from this record and be tagged with W.P. (PIL) No. 1872 of 2010.

2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner of I.A. No. 184 of 2013, the instant interlocutory application is delinked from this record and ordered to be tagged with W.P. (PIL) No. 1872 of 2010.

3. Learned counsel for the intervenor is permitted to make necessary correction in the public interest litigation of the instant interlocutory application during course of the day in red ink.

4. The instant Public Interest Litigation being W.P. (PIL) No. 6141 of 2008 has been filed by a practicing advocate of the High Court, Ranchi to issue directions upon the respondents to implement the directions of the Central Government under the Environment Protection Act, 1986, all its rules, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with regard to the environmental pollution in the cities of Ranchi, Dhanbad, Jamshedpur, Bokaro, Hazaribag and Dumka.

5. The grievance of the petitioner is that the pollution caused by automobiles and other vehicles in the city has exceeded the permissible limit. Therefore, the petitioner seeks for a direction to strictly enforce the pollution norms under Schedules 3 and 4 of the Environment Protection Rules, 1986.

6. In the public interest litigation, which is pending since 2008, number of orders have been passed by this Court. By order No. 47 dated 17.4.2012 the Court has constituted a committee headed by the Secretary, Department of Transport, Government of Jharkhand with members of the Regional Transport Authority, South Chottanagpur, learned advocate, Mr. Delip Jerath, learned senior advocate, Mr. Sohail Anwar and Additional Advocate General, Mr. Ajit Kumar. In the said order the Court has also observed that if the committee wants to take help of any expert in the field of dealing with the issue of pollution control, they may be free to take help of that person or authority. The Member Secretary of the State Pollution Board has also been made member of the said committee.

7. Learned counsel for the parties submitted that the committee held the meeting periodically and deliberated on various issues and considered suggestions to be made to reduce the pollution and also to increase the public transport system in the city of Ranchi. The committee has filed its last report on 17.10.2013.

8. The grievance of the petitioner is that in spite of various reports filed by the committee nothing substantial has been done to reduce the pollution and also to improve the transport system in the Ranchi city. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks further direction on the committee to deliberate further and to make valuable suggestion to reduce the pollution and to increase the transport system in the Ranchi city. Learned counsel also submitted that various oil companies have made proposals for supply of alternative clean fuel so as to reduce the emission caused by the pollution. Learned counsel further submitted that in spite of applications made by various oil companies the same are pending consideration before the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi.

9. Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct the committee to hold meeting once in a month starting from the month of January, 2014 and file a consolidated report making (i) proposals/suggestions to reduce the pollution in the city of Ranchi; (ii) to increase the public transport system in the city of Ranchi and (iii) the option to use alternative clean fuel and other relevant suggestions. Further, since the responsibility of implementation of various suggestions to be made by the committee vest with the Urban Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, therefore, the Principal Secretary, Urban Development Department shall also be a member of the Committee and shall participate in all the deliberations. List both the cases in the 1st Week of May, 2014.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More