Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Yadav Vs The State of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court 5 Apr 2011 A.B.A. No. 641 of 2011 (2011) 04 JH CK 0030
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

A.B.A. No. 641 of 2011

Hon'ble Bench

Prashant Kumar, J

Acts Referred
  • Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (CrPC) - Section 438(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Prashant Kumar, J.@mdashAnticipatory bail application filed by Vijay Kumar Yadav @ Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Yadav, is moved by Sri Laljee Sahay, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and opposed by Sri Tapas Roy, learned Additional P.P. for the State.

2. Admittedly, Petitioner is not named in first information report. However, charge sheet reveals that one Munna Modi produced mobile phone in the police station and had said that he purchased the same jointly from four accused persons including Petitioner.

3. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow this application and direct the Petitioner above named to surrender in the court below by 19th of April, 2011 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of C.J.M., Giridih, in connection with Dhanbar P.S. Case No. 244 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 2635 of 2008, subject to the condition as laid down u/s 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure

From The Blog
India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Nov
18
2025

Court News

India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Read More
Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Nov
18
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Read More