Kaushalya Devi Vs State of Jharkhand and Others

Jharkhand High Court 17 Feb 2005 Writ Petition (S) No. 679 of 2005 (2005) 2 JCR 356
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 679 of 2005

Hon'ble Bench

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, Acting C.J.

Advocates

A. Allam and R. Bardhan, Alok Lal, for the Appellant; Azimuddin, JC to GP 1, for the Respondent

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

S.J. Mukhopadhaya, A.C.J.

1. According to the petitioner, her husband late Madan Mohan Prasad No. 1, was Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Commissioner-cum-Special

Secretary, Cabinet (Vigilance), Technical Examination Cell (Rural Development Department). While in service, her husband was not paid the

arrears of salary on revision of pay for the period from 1st May, 2000 to 14th November, 2000 i.e. the period he was in the services of combined

State of Bihar as also for the period from 15th November, 2000 to 31st July, 2003 i.e. the period while he was under the State of Jharkhand. He

subsequently died on 5th June, 2004.

2. In the present case, grievance has been made that the respondents have not yet paid her the aforesaid benefits, and including the provident fund

amount, to which her husband was entitled to.

3. Counsel for the State submitted that if the petitioner brings her grievances to the notice of the competent authority, it will be looked into.

4. In the facts and circumstances, the case is remitted to the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of

Jharkhand, Ranchi, which is stated to be the parent department of the deceased employee, who will take up the matter with the Secretary, Rural

Development Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi and the Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, and determine

the claim within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

5. If any amount is found payable, the respondents will pay the same to the widow of the deceased employee within one month thereof i.e. within a

total period of four months from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

6. However, if one or other authority disputes the claim or part thereof, he will communicate the ground to the petitioner.

7. The writ petition, stands disposed of with the aforesaid observations and direction.

From The Blog
SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC: Written Arrest Grounds Mandatory, Oral Explanation Insufficient
Read More
SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Oct
18
2025

Story

SC Raps Insurers for Unnecessary Appeals, Delaying Payouts
Read More