🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Sonu Kumar Bhagat Alias Sanjeev Ranjan Vs State of Jharkhand

Case No: B.A. No. 4126 of 2013

Date of Decision: July 11, 2013

Acts Referred: Arms Act, 1959 — Section 27#Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) — Section 307, 323, 341, 354, 376

Citation: (2013) 3 AJR 516

Hon'ble Judges: Jaya Roy, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: S.P. Roy, for the Appellant;

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Jaya Roy, J.@mdashHeard counsel appearing for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State. Counsel appearing for the petitioner has

submitted that though the case has been registered under Sections 458/449/341/323/307/376/511/504 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27

of the Arms Act but charge-sheet has been submitted only under Sections 458/450/341/323/307/354/504 of the Indian Penal Code even injury

report of the husband of the informant shows that he has received simple injuries on his finger of the right hand. It is further submitted that the

petitioner is in custody since 2nd February, 2013 i.e. more than five months.

2. Counsel appearing for the State has opposed but not disputed the aforesaid contentions made by the counsel for the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by both the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner, above named, is

directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of

Shri Dhananjay Kumar, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda in connection with Poraiyahat P.S. Case No. 16 of 2013 corresponding to G.R.

No. 123 of 2013 subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be local resident having immovable property within the jurisdiction of district

concerned.