🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Ganga Devi Vs Jharkhand State Electricity Board and Others

Case No: Writ Petition (C) No. 3459 of 2003

Date of Decision: Nov. 21, 2003

Acts Referred: Constitution of India, 1950 — Article 226

Citation: (2004) 1 JCR 21

Hon'ble Judges: M.Y. Eqbal, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: P.K. Prasad, V.K. Prasad and Amit Kumar, for the Appellant; Anoop Kumar Mehta, for the Respondent

Final Decision: Allowed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

M.Y. Eqbal, J.@mdashIn the instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for grant of compensation on account of death of her husband due

to electrocution.

2. Petitioner''s husband Jainandan Mahto was an employee of Central Coalfied Limited posted at Rajrappa Project in the district of Hazaribagh. It

is stated that the respondent-Jharkhand State Electricity Board left live electric wire of 33000 volts on the road at village, Kundra Kalan.

Petitioner''s husband was going on his scooter and because of live electric wire of 33000 volts lying abandoned on the road, the deceased was

charged to death immediately on coming into contact with the said live wire. The scooter bearing registration No. BHM 2071 was completely

burnt. A police case was registered under Sections 304A and 287 of the Indian Penal Code being Rajrappa P.S. case No. 191/2000. Petitioner''s

case is that on account of the aforesaid criminal act of negligence on the part of the respondent-Board and its authorities she became widow at the

age of 42 years. The petitioner filed a representation to the Board for payment of compensation of rupees ten lacs and also employment of her son

but inspite of assurances given by the Board, the compensation amount has not been paid.

3. The respondents-Board, in their counter affidavit, stated that the electric line in the said area has been subject to recurrent occurrence of theft of

conductor wire by antisocial elements. The conductor wire gets weakened due to this resulting into shaping of the wire which might have led to the

death of the petitioner''s husband. It is further stated that due to continuous pilferage of energy, the wires have become weak and they lie hanging.

Lastly it is contended that there is no provision for payment of compensation by the respondents in such cases;

4. There is no dispute that the petitioner''s husband, while going on his scooter, came into contact of the live electric wire of 33000 volts lying on

the road at village, Kundra Kalan. It was the responsibility of the Board and its authorities not to allow the naked wires of 33000 volts lying on the

road. The stand of the respondents that due to pilferage of energy and theft of conductor wires by antisocial elements the wire was lying on the

road, cannot be accepted. In my opinion it is because of the gross negligence on the part of the Board and its authorities, the deceased husband of

the petitioner died on account of electrocution. The Board is, therefore, liable to pay compensation to the petitioner.

5. So far quantum of compensation is concerned, the Chairman of the Jharkhand State Electricity Board shall assess the quantum of compensation

taking into con sideration the monthly income and age of the deceased and shall pay the same within a period of two months from the date of

receipt of a copy of this order. This writ application is, accordingly, allowed.