Niyati Rani Roy & Ors. Vs State Of Tripura & Ors.

Tripura High Court- Agartala 2 Feb 2024 Writ Petition (C) No. 58 Of 2024 (2024) 02 TP CK 0004
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 58 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

S.D Purkayastha, J

Advocates

P. Roy Barman, S. Debbarman, K. Reang

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.D Purkayastha, J

Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. S. Debbarman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or any other order(s) shall not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Since Ms. K. Reang, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya, learned G.A appears and accepts notice for the respondents No.1 to 11 and Mr. B. Majumder, learned Deputy SGI appearing for the respondent No.12, no formal notice needs be issued.

The respondents are directed to file the counter affidavit, if any, within 4[four] weeks. Rejoinder, if any, within 2[two] weeks thereafter.

List this matter for hearing in its usual turn.

From The Blog
CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Dec
16
2025

Court News

CBDT Cracks Down on Bogus Deduction Claims: Taxpayers to Get SMS and Email Alerts
Read More
Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Dec
16
2025

Court News

Gujarat High Court: Myopic Reading of Sections 129 & 130 of CGST Act Would Create Hostility
Read More