Anita Roy & Ors. Vs State Of Tripura & Ors.

Tripura High Court- Agartala 2 Feb 2024 Writ Petition (C) No. 59 Of 2024 (2024) 02 TP CK 0005
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 59 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

S.D Purkayastha, J

Advocates

P. Roy Barman, S. Debbarman, K. Reang

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.D Purkayastha, J

Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. S. Debbarman, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.

Issue notice calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Rule should not be issued as prayed for; and/or any other order(s) shall not be passed as to this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Since Ms. K. Reang, learned counsel appearing on instruction of Mr. Kohinoor N. Bhattacharya, learned G.A appears and accepts notice for the respondents No.1 to 21 and Mr. B. Majumder, learned Deputy SGI appearing for the respondent No.22, no formal notice needs be issued.

The respondents are directed to file the counter affidavit, if any, within 4[four] weeks. Rejoinder, if any, within 2[two] weeks thereafter.

List this matter for hearing in its usual turn.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Declares: Anticipatory Bail Is Exceptional, Not the Rule
Feb
01
2026

Court News

Supreme Court Declares: Anticipatory Bail Is Exceptional, Not the Rule
Read More
Delhi High Court Rules: Undated Cheques Hold Legal Value in Loan Recovery Cases
Feb
01
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Rules: Undated Cheques Hold Legal Value in Loan Recovery Cases
Read More