Md. Deepraj Sarkar Vs Tahima Aktar

Tripura High Court- Agartala 28 Mar 2024 Interlocutory Application No. 1 Of 2024 In First Appeal No. 3 Of 2024 (2024) 03 TP CK 0023
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Interlocutory Application No. 1 Of 2024 In First Appeal No. 3 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Arindam Lodh, J; S.D. Purkayastha, J

Advocates

D.K. Das Choudhury, A. Debbarma

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 5

Judgement Text

Translate:

Heard Mr. D.K. Das Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Ms. A. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.

This is an application filed under Section 5 of Limitation Act for condoning the delay of 89 days in preferring the connected appeal against the order dated 05.09.2023 passed by the Ld. Judge, Family Court, Udaipur, Tripura, in case No.TS(RCR) 20 of 2023.

Mr. Das Choudhury, learned counsel has submitted that the delay caused in preferring the appeal was unintentional and the reasons for the same have been explained in the instant application.

Ms. Debbarma, learned counsel has not raised any objection to the prayer for condonation of delay.

Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the reasons for causing delay, we deem it fit to allow the instant application.

Accordingly, the delay of 89 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned and the present application is allowed and disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Hindu Widow Daughter-in-Law Entitled to Maintenance from Father-in-Law’s Estate
Jan
15
2026

Court News

Supreme Court: Hindu Widow Daughter-in-Law Entitled to Maintenance from Father-in-Law’s Estate
Read More
MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Not Proof of Age in Service Records
Jan
15
2026

Court News

MP High Court: Aadhaar and Voter ID Not Proof of Age in Service Records
Read More