A.C. Upadhyay, J.@mdashThis is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus.
The prayer of the petitioner reads as follows : ?
Under the premises aforesaid it is, therefore, prayed that your Lordship may be pleased to admit this petition, call for the records, issue rule calling
upon the respondents to show cause as to why the writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction should not be
issued directing the respondents to ensure that the petitioners are not unnecessarily harassed by Army personnel and other miscreants and after
hearing the parties the cause''s as being shown if any be pleased to make rule absolute and also may be pleased to pass such other order/orders as
your Lordship may deem fit and proper.
2. Heard Ms. S. Dutta Learned Counsel for the petitioners and Ms. B. Goyal, learned G.A. Assam.
3. The petitioners alleged that a few persons, who have joined together with the Army personnel, introduced themselves as SULFA and they have
been giving harassment for a period almost six months and threatening the petitioners to implicate false accusations against them. It is also alleged
by the petitioners that the miscreants under the banner of SULFA came every alternate two weeks and threatened the petitioners and their family
with dire consequences if cash amount demanded by them was not paid. The petitioners further stated that those SULFA miscreants also stalked
at the residence of the petitioner at night in drunken state and tortured them mentally and abused them with filthy words. The petitioners were also
threatened not to lodge any complaint in the police station. Even though a memorandum was submitted before the Chief Minister through the
Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia by the All Assam Moran Students'' Union on 18.2.2008, however, that did not yield any fruit.
4. In response to the petition filed by the petitioners, the respondents, Deputy Commissioner, Tinsukia, Superintendent of Police, Tinsukia and
Commandant, Jammu Kashmir Rifles, filed affidavit in-opposition denying the facts allened The Dy. Commissioner, Tinsukia, in his affidavit stated
that he did not receive any report regarding the allegations made by the writ petitioners in the writ petition. He, further, stated that the allegations
and statements made in the writ petition, are vague and sweeping which is devoid of allegations involvement of any specific individual in the
incident, which left him clueless to verify the allegations made by the writ petitioners. It was submitted by the Learned Counsel for the respondents
that in the event of receipt of a report regarding such incident, all necessary enquiries/investigations would be made and necessary protection would
also be given to the petitioners under the law. Similarly, the Superintendent of Police, Tinsukia also stated that he had no information regarding the
alleged incident narrated by the petitioners in the writ petition. He, however, assured that in the event of receiving any report regarding such
incident, enquiry will definitely be made and necessary protection would be extended to the petitioners.
In reply to the above affidavit, the petitioners submitted affidavit in reply before this Court.
5. The affidavit submitted on behalf of the Union of India and the Commandant, Jammu Kashmir Rifles stated that the statements made by the
petitioners are misconceived and untenable in law. In response to a pointed query made by this Court to the Learned Counsel for the petitioners as
to whether any report of harassment and torture was made before the police or any authority concerned by the petitioners. In reply to the inquiry,
the Learned Counsel drew our attention to a memorandum addressed to the Chief Minister submitted by All Assam Moran Students'' Union
representing the incident before the Chief Minister at Annexure-2, filed together with the writ petition. The context of the memorandum at
Annexure-2, reads as follows:
Sir,
Dated 18.2.2008
Accept congratulations.
All Assam Moran Students'' Union is seeking for a political and peaceful disposal of the whole conflicts of Assam India. In Assam today the
innocent people have died and have to go to jail custody besides doing ultimate harassment to them.
There has been doing ultimate harassment upon the innocent people of various regions of Tinsukia specially in the region of Talap Kordoiguri for
several days by the Army and a part of SULFA.
So, today the All Assam Moran Students'' Union accept the functioning of ""Dharna"" along with demanding to take necessary steps for establishing
peaceness in the aforesaid regions.
Otherwise if occurs population explosion in protesting to it the Union of public would have no responsibility.
Sincerely.
Sd/- Sd/
Sri Dipen Moran Sri Arunjyoti Chutia
President General Secretary
Assam Moran Sabha All Assam Moran Students'' Union
Sd/- Sd/-
Smt. Suntara Bora Moran Sri Nava Kumar Moran
President Vice President
Moran Jatiya Mahila Parishad All Assam Moran Students''
Union.
Smt. Depanjali Kakioti
Gen. Secretary
Moran Jatiya Mahila Parishad.
6. On careful perusal of the aforesaid memorandum, we are unable to find any prima facie materials, which discloses a case of harassment to the
petitioners by SULFA activist as stated in the writ petition.
7. Hon''ble the Supreme Court in Common Cause, A Registered Society Vs. Union of India and Others, categorically stressed the need to
ascertain that a prima facie offence is made out before a court resolves to order an investigation by the police into the matter. Hon''ble Supreme
Court has prohibited the courts from issuing directions to the investigating agency to enquire as to whether any person has committed an offence or
not , as it would be violative of Article 21 of Constitution.
8. On careful perusal of the materials on record and conjoint reading of the statements made by the writ petitioners as well as the affidavit in-
opposition submitted by the respondents together with the documents annexed with the writ petition, no prima facie case is made out to enable this
Court to exercise its jurisdiction to issue a direction to the State respondents or any other authority concerned on this matter as prayed for.
Consequently, we have no hesitation to hold that the writ petition is devoid of merit and it is liable to be dismissed, which we accordingly do so.
9. The writ petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs.
Before parting with the record, we consider it appropriate to say that the petitioner would be well advised if he decides to submit appropriate
application to the Superintendent of Police at Tinsukia by precisely narrating the specific allegations, if any, against any individual or authority.