Anil R. Dave, J.@mdashAt the instance of the revenue, the following questions of law have been referred to this Court for its opinion by the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench ""A"", under the provisions of Section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred
to as ""the Act""):
1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law that the interest on debentures issued by companies
other than local authority, company or corporation established by a central, State or Provincial Act is not liable to be computed as income under
the head ""interest"" on securities?
2. Whether interest on debentures in all circumstances is liable to be considered Income only when received by the assessee and not when it has
been due?
2. We have heard learned Standing Counsel Shri Manish Bhatt appearing for the revenue and learned advocate Shri B.G. Karia appearing for
learned advocate Shri R.K. Patel for the respondent.
3. Upon hearing the learned advocates and looking to the facts of the case, we need not discuss the facts for the reason that the questions, which
have been referred to hereinabove, are no more res integra.
4. Our attention has been drawn to the judgement delivered in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Upnishad Investment P. Ltd. and
Others,
5. Similar questions had been raised in the case referred to hereinabove. We are in respectful agreement with the ratio of the judgement delivered
in the case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Upnishad investment Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. (Supra).
6. In view of the law laid down in the judgement referred to hereinabove, we answer the first question in the negative i.e. in favour of the revenue
and against the assessee, whereas the second question is answered in the affirmative i.e. in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
7. The reference, thus, stands disposed of with no order as to costs.
