Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Ansal Housing and Construction Ltd.

Delhi High Court 1 Oct 2001 IT Appeal No. 114 of 2001 1 October 2001 (2001) 10 DEL CK 0133
Bench: Full Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IT Appeal No. 114 of 2001 1 October 2001

Hon'ble Bench

Arijit Pasayat, C.J; D.K. Jain, J

Advocates

R.D. Jolly and Ms. Prem Lata Bansal, for the Revenue S.R. Wadhwa, for the assessee, for the Appellant;

Judgement Text

Translate:

Admit.

2. The following questions of law shall be adjudicated :

"1. Whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the addition of Rs. 7,80,969 by holding that provisions of sections 22 and 23 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 were not applicable to the properties owned by the assessed ?

2. Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that depreciation @ 100% was allowable on shuttering tubular scaffolding ?

3. Whether the Tribunal was correct in treating the interest income and other income as business income of the assessed for the purposes of allowing deduction u/s 32AB of the Act ?"

3. The appellant shall file within three months ten copies of the cyclostyled paper books, containing all documents on which reliance was placed before the Tribunal, including any order/orders, either in the case of the assessed itself or in case of any other assessed, which has been followed by the Tribunal.

4. The appeal shall be heard along with IT Appeal No. 18 of 1999.

From The Blog
India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Nov
18
2025

Court News

India vs USA: Key Legal and Regulatory Challenges for Global Businesses
Read More
Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Nov
18
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Rules Habeas Corpus Cannot Release Accused After Bail Pleas Are Dismissed
Read More