Meenakshi Vs Sanjay

Delhi High Court 11 Sep 2002 CM 964 of 2001 in FAO 526 of 2001 (2003) 68 DRJ 124
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

CM 964 of 2001 in FAO 526 of 2001

Hon'ble Bench

S.K. Mahajan, J

Advocates

Kamal Katyan, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred

Limitation Act, 1963 — Section 5

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.K. Mahajan, J.@mdashThere is a delay of 37 days in filing the appeal for the condensation of which an application was filed by the appellant. It

is submitted in the application that the appellant had given instructions to her counsel to file appeal against the impugned order and apply for

certified copy of the same, however, it was only on 3.10.2001 that the appellant was informed by the counsel that certified copy of the impugned

judgment and decree was not applied by the counsel. The appellant is stated to have engaged a new counsel thereafter who applied for certified

copy and filed the appeal after certified copy was received. It is submitted that the delay in filing the appeal is due to the negligence of the counsel

who was looking after the case of the appellant and was not on account of the negligence of the applicant. Despite service no one has appeared on

behalf of the respondent nor reply has been filed. I have, Therefore, no reason to disbelieve the averments made in the application. I, accordingly,

allow this application and condone the delay in filing the appeal. The application stands disposed of.

FAO 526/2001

2. Issue notice to the respondent both by ordinary process as well as by registered post, returnable on 09.12.2002.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More