Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Continental Air Express (P.) Ltd.

Delhi High Court 8 Sep 2008 IT Appeal No. 967 of 2008 (2008) 09 DEL CK 0274
Bench: Division Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IT Appeal No. 967 of 2008

Hon'ble Bench

Rajiv Shakdher, J; Badar Durrez Ahmed, J

Advocates

Prem Lata Bansal, for the Appellant; S. Narayana and I.C. Kumar, for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Income Tax Act, 1961 - Section 271(1)

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the Tribunal''s order dated 10-9-2007. The impugned order relates to the assessment year 2001-02. It is also relevant to note that the impugned order is a composite order for two assessees Continental Carriers Pvt. Ltd. and Continental Air Express Pvt. Ltd. (''the assessee'' in the present case).

2. In the case of the assessee [Continental Air Express (P.) Ltd.] it has been noted in the order of the Tribunal that the issue in the quantum appeal has been sent back for a consideration afresh by the Tribunal to the Assessing Officer.

3. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel for the respondent/assessee that the present proceedings pertain to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) and are relatable to the issue of disallowance of foreign travel expenses by the Assessing Officer. He has placed before us a copy of the order passed on 5-4-2007 by the Tribunal in the quantum appeal [ITA No. 1397/Delhi/2005] filed by the assessee before the Tribunal. Paragraph 7 of the said order dated 5-4-2007 clearly indicates that the issue of disallowance of foreign travel expenses has been sent back to the Assessing Officer for a decision afresh after the earlier orders passed by the Assessing Officer and the CIT (Appeals) have been set aside. It was, therefore, contended by the learned counsel for the respondent that since the quantum appeal was allowed on this ground and the matter has been remanded to the Assessing Officer, the penalty proceedings arising out of the very same orders cannot survive any further. It has also been confirmed by the learned counsel for the appellant that the revenue has not preferred any appeal against the said order passed by the Tribunal on 5-4-2007 in ITA No. 1397/Delhi/2005.

4. We find ourselves in agreement with the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respondent and are consequently of the view that there is no merit in this appeal.

5. The appeal is dismissed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More