S.V.R. Enterprises Vs Netizen Engg. Pvt. Ltd

National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench Court IV 29 Mar 2023 IA-1151/2023 IN C.P. (IB)/88(MB)2018 (2023) 03 NCLT CK 0090
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

IA-1151/2023 IN C.P. (IB)/88(MB)2018

Hon'ble Bench

Kishore Vemulapalli, Member (J); Prabhat Kumar, Member (T)

Advocates

Prachi Pandya, Monica Salian, Shyam Kapadia, Sandeep Goyal

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 - Section 9, 12A
  • National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 - Rule 11

Judgement Text

Translate:

IA-1151/2023

1. Ms. Prachi Pandya a/w Ms. Monica Salian i/b Corporate Attorneys, Ld. Counsel for the Operational Creditor/Applicant present. Mr. Shyam Kapadia a/w Mr. Sandeep Goyal i/b Mulla & Mulla & CB & C, Ld. Counsel for the Corporate Debtor present.

2. This is an Application filed by the Operational Creditor for withdrawal of order dated 24.03.2023 initiating CIRP against the Corporate Debtor. Counsel for the Operational Creditor submits that while settlement talks between the parties were going on and were on verge of finalisation, this order came. However, the Corporate Debtor has undertaken to pay a sum of Rs.84,00,000/- (Rupees Eighty-Four Lakhs only) to the Operational Creditor in full and final settlement and have entered into a consent term on 27.03.2023. In view thereof, the Operational Creditor seeks withdrawal of his Application in terms of Section 12A of the Code.

3. The Counsel for the Corporate Debtor submits that the CoC has not been constituted as yet and IRP has not taken charge of the Corporate Debtor so far. The Counsel was asked to clarify the effect of decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in the case of Abhishek Singh Vs. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd. & Anr. [Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.6452 of 2021]. Ld. Counsel submitted that its case is squarely covered and this Application, if allowed shall not be in contravention of the decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the said case as the facts in the said decision and the present case are similar.

4. We have perused the Application and decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India and find that this withdrawal application deserves to be allowed. In view of the above, IA-1151/2023 is allowed and disposed of.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More