Smt. Janak Rani Chadha Vs State (NCT of Delhi) and Another

Delhi High Court 19 Oct 2006 Probate Case 9 of 2003 (2006) 10 DEL CK 0135
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Probate Case 9 of 2003

Hon'ble Bench

Rekha Sharma, J

Advocates

S.K.Sharma, for the Appellant; Ravi Ashri, for the Respondent

Acts Referred
  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 15, 16, 25, 27
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 302, 304
  • Succession Act, 1925 - Section 273, 278

Judgement Text

Translate:

Rekha Sharma, J.@mdashSmt.Janak Rani and Shri Surjit Kumar Chadha lost their daughter and what has added to their misery is that that precious life was lost at the hands of their son-in-law to whom they had given her hand in marriage. The deceased was Smt.Shamma Chadha. She was married to Shri Prabhat Uppal. The deceased has left behind property bearing plot No. 4 Road P1, admeasuring 250.56 sq.mtrs. situated at Village Shahpur now known as DLF Qutab Enclave Complex Tehsil and District Gurgaon. The said property was purchased by her prior to her marriage and as she died intestate, her parents are now claiming ''Letters of Administration'' with regard to it under Sections 273 and 278 of the Indian Succession Act.

2. Notice of the probate petition was issued to the husband of the deceased and so also to the public at large through publication in the newspaper ''The Statesman'' inviting of objections, if any. In response to the notice, the husband filed his reply stating that he had no objection to the grant of ''Letters of Administration'' to the parents of the deceased. His parents also laid no claim to the property.

3. It is not in dispute that the husband was convicted u/s 302 IPC for committing the murder of his wife and that in appeal his conviction was converted from Section 302 to Section 304 IPC Part I. It is laid down in Section 25 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 that a person who commits murder shall be disqualified from inheriting the property of the person murdered. If the husband has not staked claim to the property of his wife it is not on account of any remorse on his part but because of this section. I say so for the reason, that during the course of arguments his counsel contended that the property should go to his parents, despite the fact, that the parents themselves had made no claim to it. The submission was based on Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 which reads as under : -

15.General rules of succession in the case of female Hindus:- (1) The property of a female Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the rules set out in Section 16,-

(a) firstly, upon the sons and daughters (including the children of any pre-deceased son or daughter) and the husband;

(b) secondly, upon the heirs of the husband;

(c) thirdly, upon the mother and father;

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner rebutted the submission and in support relied upon Section 27 of the Hindu Succession Act which lays down that if any person is disqualified from inheriting any property under this Act, it shall devolve as if such person had died before the intestate.

5. There is no dispute that in view of Section 25 of the Hindu Succession Act the husband is not entitled to claim inheritance to the property of his deceased wife. The said section has been incorporated in the Act on the maxim

Nemo Ex Suo Delicto Melforem Suam Conditionem force Protest. It is based on the principles of justice, equity and good conscience to make it impossible for a murderer who deserves to be hanged or to be shut behind the prison bars for life, to derive advantage or beneficial interest from the very heinous act committed by him. This has been so stated in the case Nannepuneni Seetharamaiah and Others Vs. Nannepuneni Ramakrishnaiah, . I am in complete agreement with what has been held in the said judgment.

6. As regards Section 27 it goes a step further. It treats, of-course by fiction of law, such person as is described in Section 25 as dead before the intestate. This means that he was non-existent for the purpose of inheritance and Therefore no right to the estate of the deceased can be claimed through him. Admittedly the parents of the husband have no independent locus to claim inheritance to the property of the deceased. They can claim only through their son which is impermisable.

7. Coming to the parents of the deceased they, in order to prove their claim have filed their evidence by way of affidavits in which they have reiterated the averments made in the petition. I have no reason to disbelieve either the averments made in the petition or the affidavits of the parents. Accordingly, I hold, that they are entitled to ''Letters of Administration'' in respect of the property bearing plot No. 4 Road P1, admeasuring 250.56 sq.mtrs. situated at Village Shahpur now known as DLF Qutab Enclave Complex Tehsil and District Gurgaon subject to their furnishing of valuation certificate from the Collector, payment of court fee thereon, Administration Bond and Surety Bond.

8. File be consigned to record.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More