Jagat Rai and Another Vs The State of Bihar

Patna High Court 17 May 2004 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30986 of 2003 (2004) 05 PAT CK 0003
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 30986 of 2003

Hon'ble Bench

Mridula Mishra, J

Advocates

Sudhir Singh, for the Appellant; Rudradeo Kr. Sinha for the State, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 147, 148, 307, 427

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

Mridula Mishra, J.@mdashHeard learned counsel for the petitioners and the counsel appearing for the State. This application has been filed in a peculiar circumstances for quashing the order dated 10.2.2003, passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur by which cognizance has been taken under Sections 147, 148, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Lalganj P.S. Case no. 59 of 1981 was instituted with regard to occurrence which took place on 4.1.1981 and after investigation chargesheet was submitted being Chargesheet No. 85 of 1981 under Sections 147, 148, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. The matter remained pending for long 22 years and thereafter by order dated 10.2.2003 cognizance has been taken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur. It has been submitted by the counsel for the petitioners that the allegations which is made in the F.I.R, do not make out an offence u/s 307 of the Indian Penal Code. It has also been submitted that the matter remained pending for long 22 years. Parties are gotias and they have also compromised the matter out of the court and a compromise petition has also been filed before the court concerned.

3. As the informant is not ready to pursue the matter, the counsel for the petitioners has also stated that even in non compoundable offence it has been held by the Supreme Court that on account of delay such matters can be compromised Most surprising aspect of this case is that even after submission of the chargesheet the Magistrate has kept this matter pending for 22 years for taking cognizance.

4. On consideration of the F.I.R. it is also apparent that the allegations are not sufficient to make out an offence u/s 307 of the Indian Penal Code. Apart from delay, since the parties have compromised the case and they have also filed compromise petition, there are sufficient ground for quashing the order taking cognizance. Accordingly this application is allowed and the impugned order taking cognizance dated 10.2.2003, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in Lalganj P.S. Case No. 59 of 1981 is hereby quashed.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More