CCE, Jaipur-I. Vs M/s Lakhlan & Qureshi Construction Company

Customs, Excise And Service Tax Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi 17 Feb 2013 Service Tax Appeal No. 69 Of 2012 (2013) 02 CESTAT CK 0002
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Service Tax Appeal No. 69 Of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Dr. Satish Chandra, J; V. Padmanabhan, Technical Member

Advocates

Ranjan Khanna, Rupender Singh

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. The present appeal is filed by the department against order in original No. 51/2011 dated 17.10.2011 passed by the Commissioner, Central Excise,

Jaipur.

2. Heard Sh. Ranjan Khanna, ld. AR for the Revenue and Shri Rupender Singh, ld. Counsel for the assessee.

3. After hearing both sides, it appears that against the impugned order the assessee has also filed appeal before the Tribunal (Final Order No. 51039-

40/2014 dated 20.02.2014 vide which the Tribunal has remanded the matter to the Commissioner for denovo adjudication.

4. Hence, we also set-aside the impugned order and remand the departmental appeal to the original authority to decide the issue denovo. During the

course of argument, it was informed that the earlier appeal is still pending, if so, then the adjudicating authority may decide both the appeals

simultaneously but by providing a reasonable opportunity to the assessee to present their case with liberty to file additional evidence, if any, as per law.

5. In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed by way of remand.

(Dictated and pronounced in the open Court).

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More