Baijnath Das Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 18 Jan 2002 L.P.A. No. 92 of 2002 (2002) 01 PAT CK 0139
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

L.P.A. No. 92 of 2002

Hon'ble Bench

Ravi S. Dhavan, C.J; Shashank Kr. Singh, J

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER

1. The letters patent appeal has been filed on the order dated 11 December 2001 in CWJC. No. 15865 of 2001 Baijnath Das v. The State of Bihar and Ors.

2. The Appellant-Petitioner did not receive employment on companionate ground on the principle of rule of harness. The Appellant-Petitioner''s father had died in 1984. Seventeen years later the Appellant-Petitioner desires that he should be given an employment regard being had to the fact that this father was in government service.

3. Counsel for the Appellant Petitioner acknowledges that when the Appellant-Petitioner''s father died he was six years of age. This matter of compassionate appointments must not be reduced to a ridiculous proposition that a job must wait for the ward of a government servant, like in the present case, for 17 years. The very principle of the appointments on compassionate ground will than be destroyed. The cardinal principle is to give succour to the affected family of a government servant. There is not a circumstance of immediate succour in this case.

4. Dismissed.

From The Blog
India’s IPO Boom Fuels Demand for Capital Markets Lawyers
Dec
13
2025

Court News

India’s IPO Boom Fuels Demand for Capital Markets Lawyers
Read More
Taxation of Public and Private Trusts in India: Key Rules, Exemptions, and Compliance Challenges
Dec
13
2025

Court News

Taxation of Public and Private Trusts in India: Key Rules, Exemptions, and Compliance Challenges
Read More