Jai Prakash Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 10 Jul 2008 LPA No. 386 of 2008 (2008) 07 PAT CK 0221
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

LPA No. 386 of 2008

Hon'ble Bench

R.M. Lodha, C.J; Ghanshyam Prasad, J

Advocates

Nikhilesh Kumar, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 406, 409, 420

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. That the appellant has been arraigned as an accused in a First Information Report for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, is not in dispute. That the investigation of the said offence is still going on, is also not in dispute. The order of suspension, read in the backdrop of these facts, leaves no manner of doubt that the suspension of the appellant is relatable to Rule 9(1)(c) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 and Rule 9(7) has no application. In the circumstances, dismissal of the writ petition by the Single Judge cannot be faulted.

2. L.P.A. has no merit. It is dismissed in limine.

From The Blog
Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Apple Challenges Global Turnover-Based Penalties in Delhi High Court Under Competition Act
Read More
Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Nov
28
2025

Court News

Calcutta High Court: Written Statements Beyond 120 Days Not Allowed; Postal Service at Registered Office Valid Under CPC
Read More