Jai Prakash Singh Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 10 Jul 2008 LPA No. 386 of 2008 (2008) 07 PAT CK 0221
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

LPA No. 386 of 2008

Hon'ble Bench

R.M. Lodha, C.J; Ghanshyam Prasad, J

Advocates

Nikhilesh Kumar, for the Appellant;

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) - Section 406, 409, 420

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. That the appellant has been arraigned as an accused in a First Information Report for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, is not in dispute. That the investigation of the said offence is still going on, is also not in dispute. The order of suspension, read in the backdrop of these facts, leaves no manner of doubt that the suspension of the appellant is relatable to Rule 9(1)(c) of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005 and Rule 9(7) has no application. In the circumstances, dismissal of the writ petition by the Single Judge cannot be faulted.

2. L.P.A. has no merit. It is dismissed in limine.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: Dying Declaration Valid Even If Death Is Not Imminent
Dec
11
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Dying Declaration Valid Even If Death Is Not Imminent
Read More
Delhi High Court Rules Educational Consultancy to Foreign Universities Is Export Service, Not Intermediary
Dec
11
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Rules Educational Consultancy to Foreign Universities Is Export Service, Not Intermediary
Read More