Mukesh Kumar Agrawal Vs The State of Bihar and Others

Patna High Court 11 Jul 2008 LPA No. 516 of 2008 (2009) 1 PLJR 257
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

LPA No. 516 of 2008

Hon'ble Bench

R.M. Lodha, C.J; Barin Ghosh, J

Advocates

Sandeep Kumar Shahi, for the Appellant; Manikant Mishra, for the Respondent

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. We heard the counsel for the parties. The appeal suffers from delay of 59 days. For condonation thereof, I.A. No. 3979 of 2008 has been made. Even if we condone the delay for the reasons set out in the application, we are satisfied that the Letters Patent Appeal has no merit and does not deserve to be admitted.

2. Two facts are not disputed, namely (i) that an order of suspension was passed against the appellant on 16.10.2007, and (ii) that charge-sheet has been framed on 29.2.2008. It is true that charge-sheet has not been framed within 90 days, but, at the same time, the aforesaid date would show that it has been framed within the extended period permissible under Rule 9 of the Bihar Government Servants (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 2005.

3. In this backdrop of facts, the order of the Division Bench in the case of Chandra Shekhar Prasad vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. (LPA No. 37 of 2008) is not applicable.

4. Letters Patent Appeal has no merit. It is dismissed in limine. This disposes of I.A. No. 3979 of 2008.

From The Blog
SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC: Brother Can Sell Father’s House Even Without Share
Read More
SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Oct
31
2025

Story

SC to Decide If Women Can Face POCSO Penetrative Assault
Read More