@JUDGMENTTAG-ORDER
D.S.R. Varma, J.@mdashThe appellant herein is the 2nd respondent in the writ petition. The appeal is filed against the orders passed by the
learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.No. 877 of 2002, dated 16-4-2002 declaring the acceptance of the tender of the 2nd respondent by the
1st respondent for sanitation work in Janagaon Municipality as illegal.
2. Rule 5(2) of the A.P. Municipalities Tender Rules, 1967 contemplates that tenders from the registered contractors only shall be considered.
3. The learned Counsel for the appellant Sri Ramamohan Reddy submits that the appellant is a registered contractor, registered with the State
Government.
4. A fair reading of Rule 5(2) of the Rules reveals that the Contractor shall be registered with the Municipality. Therefore, in view of the explicit
language incorporated in Rule 5(2) of the Rules, we are of the view that the learned Single Judge is right in dismissing the contract which was
granted in favour of the appellant.
5. It was brought to our notice that pursuant to the judgment of the learned Single Judge, the writ petitioner-1st respondent herein has been allotted
the work on 24-4-2002 and he has been performing the work.
6. In view of the above, the writ appeal has to be dismissed. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. No costs.
