Radhey Shyam Singhal Vs State & Anr.

Delhi High Court 19 Nov 2019 Criminal Writ Petition No. 3234 Of 2019, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 40588 Of 2019 (2019) 11 DEL CK 0597
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Writ Petition No. 3234 Of 2019, Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 40588 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

Brijesh Sethi, J

Advocates

Sahil Upadhyay, Amanpreet Singh, Rahul Mehra, Faiz

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred

Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 420

Judgement Text

Translate:

Brijesh Sethi, J

Quashing of FIR No. 321/2019, under Section 420 IPC, registered at police station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi is sought by petitioner on the ground that dispute

between petitioner and respondent No.2/complainant stands amicably resolved in terms of Compromise Deed of 2nd November, 2019.

Notice.

Mr. Amanpreet Singh, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel respondent No.1/State submits that respondent No.2 is

present in the Court and has been duly identified to be complainant of FIR in question on the basis of identity proof furnished by him.

Respondent No.2, present in the Court, submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably resolved in terms of Compromise Deed of 2nd

November, 2019 and terms thereof have been fully acted upon as today, he has received the balance settled amount of Rs.7,00,000/- by way of

demand draft bearing No.046657, dated 11th November, 2019, drawn on AXIS Bank, New Delhi from petitioner. Respondent No.2 submits that now,

no grievance against petitioner survives and so, the FIR in question and proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.

Since the subject matter of the FIR in question stands mutually and amicably resolved between the parties, no useful purpose would be served in

continuation of proceedings arising out of FIR in question.

In view of the above, FIR No. 321/2019, under Section 420 IPC, registered at police station Jyoti Nagar, Delhi and the proceedings emanating

therefrom, are hereby quashed qua petitioner.

This petition and application stand disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More