Afijul Ansari @ Hafijul Ansari Vs State Of Jharkhand

Jharkhand High Court 29 Sep 2020 Bail Application No. 7004 Of 2020 (2020) 09 JH CK 0219
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No. 7004 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Ananda Sen, J

Advocates

Nirupama, Nehala Sharmin

Final Decision

Allowed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State, through Video Conferencing. The lawyers have no objection with

regard to the proceeding which has been held through video conferencing today at 11.00 a.m.. They have no complain with respect to the audio and

video clarity and quality.

Counsel for the petitioner prays for ignoring the defects and to take up this matter on merits. Accordingly, the defects are ignored for the present.

Petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mahuatand

Police Station Case No.34 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. No.1012 of 2019, pending in the Court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo

at Tenughat.

Petitioner is in custody since 26.06.2020. Chargesheet has already been submitted in this case. Counsel for the petitioner, by referring to paragraph 9

of the application, submits that the petitioner was not put on Test Identification Parade. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this

petitioner. He was arrested in another case wherein he confessed about his involvement in the instant case.

Considering the aforesaid materials and the fact that the petitioner was not put on Test Identification Parade and chargesheet has already been

submitted, I am inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, petitioner, namely, Afijul Ansari @ Hafijul Ansari, is directed to be released on bail

on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub

Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat in connection with Mahuatand Police Station Case No.34 of 2019 corresponding to G.R. No. 1012

of 2019, subject to the condition that one of the bailers must be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient landed property in his/her name and

with a further condition that the petitioner shall appear and mark his attendance before the Officer-in- Charge, Mahuatand Police Station, Bokaro once

a month, failing which the Officer-in-Charge concerned shall take all steps for his re-arrest.

I direct the Jail Authority that before releasing the petitioner from jail, the Jail Authority should get the petitioner tested for COVID-19. If the report is

positive, then the District Administration will immediately take steps to isolate the petitioner and get him treated in the COVID Centre by following all

the protocols.

This direction is given in the larger public interest and it should not be construed as a condition of bail.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Clarifies: ‘No Coercive Measures’ Protects Only Against Arrest, Not Investigation Stay
Read More
Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Nov
06
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Orders Compensatory Plantation on 185 Acres in Delhi Ridge by March 2026
Read More