Uttam Kumar Tikariha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 9 Sep 2019 Writ Petition (S) No. 6986 Of 2019 (2019) 09 CHH CK 0057
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 6986 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Shashank Thakur, Jitendra Pali

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. Challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of transfer dated 22.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Damdha, Durg

to Bijapur, District Bijapur.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that, the petitioner has got only 14 months left for retirement. The second ground raised by the petitioner is that,

the petitioner is more than 60 years of age and that as per the transfer policy a person with more than 55 years of age should not be sent to a

scheduled area and core scheduled area whereas, vide the impugned order the petitioner is being sent to a core scheduled area which is violative of

transfer policy.

3. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of 10 day from today,

and the respondents, in turn, shall consider and decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days. Till the representation of

the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order so far as petitioner is concerned, shall remain stayed.

4. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More