Harawati Choudhari Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 16 Oct 2019 Writ Petition (C) No. 3655 Of 2019
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 3655 Of 2019

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

Chitranjay Singh Patel, Ayaz Naved

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. The grievance of the petitioner in this petition seems to be that, the petitioner's land was acquired by the State authorities and the compensation

assessed has been wrongly received by the private respondents No.5 to 9 after manipulating the records in connivance with the concerned Patwari.

2. The pleadings of the writ petition further reveals that the petitioner had made a complaint in this regard to the respondent No.2-District Collector,

who, in turn, has forwarded the complaint to the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Officer, Gharghoda, who has registered the case and proceeding of

which is undergoing. The grievance of the petitioner is that, though the proceedings were initiated as early as in August, 2018, but no substantial

development has taken place in the said proceedings and the matter is getting delayed and lingered on without any substantial reasons. The petitioner

is a senior citizen and therefore she may get an early justice in the proceeding is what is wanted by the petitioner.

3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioner has, and the matter already being seized by the respondent No.3-Sub Divisional Officer, Gharghoda,

District Raigarh, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents

No.2&3 to ensure that the proceedings pending before the Sub Divisional Officer, Gharghoda is proceeded expeditiously and a final decision be taken

at the earliest preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. They are further directed to ensure that no

unnecessary adjournments are granted considering the age of the petitioner who is more than 70 years old.

4. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2&3 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

Moti Ram Deka & Ors vs General Manager, N.E.F. Railways & Ors (1963)
Read More
M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Oct
19
2025

Landmark Judgements

M/s. Orissa Cement Ltd. & Others vs State of Orissa & Others (1991)
Read More