Gurdeep Singh Vs State Of Punjab

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh 6 Jan 2021 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 36712 Of 2020 (2021) 01 P&H CK 0051
Bench: Single Bench
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 36712 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Raj Mohan Singh, J

Advocates

Sunny Kumar Singla, Ajay Pal Singh Gill

Acts Referred
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438, 438(2)
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 120B, 409, 420, 465, 468, 471

Judgement Text

Translate:

Raj Mohan Singh, J

The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing.

Petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in case bearing FIR No.267 dated 21.09.2020 registered under Sections 409, 420,

465, 468, 471, 120-B IPC at Police Station Bhawanigarh, District Sangrur.

On 09.11.2020, following order was passed by this Court:-

“The case has been taken up for hearing through video-conferencing.

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that presence of the petitioner was recorded during currency of posting of Makhan Singh, who had

worked on the post of Gram Rozgar Sewak prior to 18.10.2019. Petitioner has referred to Annexure P-2, where his period of work was from 2.1.2019

onwards. In CRM-M No. 35825 of 2020 titled Makhan Singh G.R.S. vs. State of Punjab, notice of motion has been issued for 06.01.2021 along with

interim order.

Notice of motion for 06.01.2021.

In the meanwhile, petitioner is directed to appear before the SHO/Investigating Officer to join investigation on 17.11.2020 at 11.00 a.m. and in the

event of his arrest, he shall be enlarged on ad interim bail, subject to his furnishing requisite bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of Arresting

Officer. However, petitioner shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

To be heard along with CRM-M No. 35825 of 2020.â€​

Learned State counsel on instructions from SI Balwinder Singh submits that in compliance of order dated 09.11.2020, the petitioner has joined the

investigation to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer and he is no more required in further investigation of the case.

In view of above, order dated 09.11.2020 is hereby made absolute.

However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so by the Investigating Officer.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More