Priyanka Singh Parihar Vs Suryakant Singh Parihar

Chhattisgarh High Court 6 Sep 2018 Writ Petition (Art. 227) No. 702 Of 2013 (2018) 09 CHH CK 0110
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (Art. 227) No. 702 Of 2013

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Vikram Sharma

Final Decision

Dismissed

Acts Referred
  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13, 24

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. By the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 4-7-2013, whereby the defendant / petitioner's

application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 has been rejected during the pendency of application under Section 13 of the said Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act,

1956 has already been rejected by the Family Court and appeal is pending consideration before this Court.

3. Since the application under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 has already been rejected, this writ petition cannot continue and is hereby

closed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 before the appellate court. No order

as to cost(s).

From The Blog
Allahabad High Court: YouTube Content Alone Not Proof of Income, Maintenance Cannot Be Denied
Dec
29
2025

Court News

Allahabad High Court: YouTube Content Alone Not Proof of Income, Maintenance Cannot Be Denied
Read More
Supreme Court Clarifies Driving Licence Renewal: No Retrospective Validity After Expiry
Dec
29
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Clarifies Driving Licence Renewal: No Retrospective Validity After Expiry
Read More