Sahadev Vs A. Mahesh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 17 Sep 2018 WP227 No. 695 Of 2018 (2018) 09 CHH CK 0270
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

WP227 No. 695 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Advocates

Pravin Kumar Tulsyan

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. By the impugned order dated 05.07.2018, learned Claims Tribunal has rejected the petitioner's application for disbursement of the compensation

amount fixed deposited against which this writ petition has been preferred.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Claims Tribunal ought to have considered petitioner's application and therefore, impugned order

is unsustainable and bad in law.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

4. The learned Claims Tribunal has not considered the application filed by the petitioner demonstrating his need for the said money in proper

perspective, therefore, the petitioner is at liberty to make fresh application before the Claims Tribunal within a period of 10 days from today that will

be considered and decided in accordance with law by the Claims Tribunal expeditiously by a reasoned and speaking order.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

From The Blog
Section 87A rebate STCG new tax regime
Nov
04
2025

Court News

Section 87A rebate STCG new tax regime
Read More
Power of Attorney validity India
Nov
04
2025

Court News

Power of Attorney validity India
Read More