Gurusharan Gupta Vs Superintendent Of Police, Kawardha And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 25 Sep 2018 Writ Petition (C) No. 2654 Of 2018 (2018) 09 CHH CK 0373
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (C) No. 2654 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

Advocates

Priyank Rathi, A. S. Kachhawaha

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 - Section 248

Judgement Text

Translate:

Prashant Kumar Mishra, J

1. Petitioner would assail the order passed by the Superintendent of Police, Kabirdham directing him to vacate the encroachment from the land

belonging to the Police/Home Department.

2. It appears, the order has not been passed in the capacity of Superintendent of Police to maintain law and order, but the same has been passed by an

Officer of the Police/Home Department under whose control the land has been settled by the Revenue Department.

3. Petitioner's counsel would submit that even if the petitioner is an encroacher, which fact is not admitted by the petitioner, he cannot be removed

from possession without taking recourse to law.

4. Let the Tehsildar, Kabirdham draw proceedings against the petitioner under Section 248 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959 and pass

necessary order after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner as well as learned State counsel shall submit certified copy of

this order before the concerned Tehsildar within a period of 15 days from today and thereafter the Tehsildar shall complete the proceedings within

next 10 weeks.

5. Till the order is passed by the Tehsildar, status-quo in respect of possession shall be maintained by the parties.

6. The writ petition stands disposed of.

From The Blog
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Nov
29
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules: Calculation Error in Section 54F Exemption Not Tax Misreporting
Read More
Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Nov
29
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Refuses to De-Freeze Bank Account, Cites Concealment in ₹19.39 Crore GST ITC Fraud Probe
Read More