Balram Prasad Shukla Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court 7 Aug 2018 Writ Petition (S) No. 1555 Of 2009
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S) No. 1555 Of 2009

Hon'ble Bench

P. Sam Koshy, J

Advocates

P. Acharya, Amrito Das, Chandresh Shrivastava

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

P. Sam Koshy, J

1. The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking for direction to the respondents for providing benefit of rehabilitation policy at the earliest and also

for implementing the order dated 20/08/2007 passed by the State Government.

2. On perusal of record this Court feels that, the substantive relief which perhaps the petitioner seeks is for getting his service rendered with the Army

i.e. a period of 2 years and 299 days to be counted for the purpose of counting his total length of service for quantifying his retiral dues, etc.

3. Perusal of record shows that, the petitioner is still in service and has got few more years left for retirement and the benefit which the petitioner is

claiming would be those which he would be receiving at the time of his retirement. That the present Writ Petition seems to have been filed more on

the apprehension of the petitioner.

4. Reserving the right of the petitioner for claiming appropriate relief at the time of his retirement if the respondents do not grant the same while

quantifying his retiral dues, the present Writ Petition in its present form stands disposed off.

5. The disposal of the Writ Petition by itself would not preclude the petitioner from making a detailed representation specifically mentioning as to what

exactly is the claim of the petitioner which according to him he is entitled from the State Government under the rehabilitation policy which has not

been provided as on date or which he would had been entitled at the time of his retirement.

6. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off.

From The Blog
Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court: 8-Year Service Termination Cannot Be Justified
Read More
Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Oct
23
2025

Story

Supreme Court Asks Centre to Respond on Online Gambling Ban
Read More