🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Ku. Alpana Yadav Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Case No: Writ Petition (C) No. 1446 Of 2018

Date of Decision: May 18, 2018

Hon'ble Judges: Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Harish Khuntiya, Ratan Pusty, Rajeev Shrivastava

Final Decision: Disposed Of

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was allowed to appear in the examination, as a special case, in November- December,

2017, but she could not appear for want of information from College / University side pursuant to which the Principal of the College has recommended

to the University for permitting her to appear in the examination of Diploma in Civil Engineering, last semester, commencing from 19-5-2018.

3. Learned counsel for the University - respondent No.3 submits that all those students who could not appear in the said examination for personal

reasons will be allowed to appear in the examination to be held in the month of November, 2018 and in that examination, the petitioner will be

permitted to appear.

4. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was allowed to appear in the said examination, as a special case, in November-December, 2017, but the said

information did not reach to the petitioner pursuant to which she could appear in the examination. It is not the fault of the petitioner, it may be the fault

of the College or the other authorities, but certainly, the petitioner cannot be made to suffer for her no fault since she is eligible and permission has

already been granted to her for appearing in the examination in November-December, 2017 and the University is ready and willing to permit her to

appear in the examination to be held from November, 2018. Therefore, it would be expedient to direct the University to permit the petitioner to appear

in the examination commencing from 19-5-2018 in Diploma in Civil Engineering, last semester, as her eligibility and qualification to appear in the

examination are not in dispute. Accordingly, the University is directed to process and allow the petitioner to appear in the said examination

commencing tomorrow.

5. Mr. Pusty and Mr. Shrivastava, learned counsel appearing for the State and the University, respectively, will inform the order of this Court to the

authorities concerned.

6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

7. Certified copy today.