🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Vinod Kumar Lalwani Vs Union Bank Of India Durg And Ors

Case No: Writ Petition (C) No. 408 Of 2018

Date of Decision: Feb. 15, 2018

Acts Referred: Code Of Civil Procedure, 1908 — Order 22 Rule 4

Hon'ble Judges: Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Dharmesh Shrivastava, R. N. Pusty

Final Decision: Dismissed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Sanjay K. Agrawal, J

1. By order dated 15.01.2018, the District Magistrate, Durg in a proceeding initiated under the SARFAESI Act, 2002 allowed the application filed by

the applicant (respondent No.1 herein) under Order 22 Rule 4 of the CPC and allowed the legal heirs of deceased Shri Ashok Kumar Lalwani to be

brought on record, being aggrieved against which this writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable and bad in law and is liable to be set aside.

3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and gone through the records with utmost circumspection.

4. On careful perusal, I do not find any legal error in the order passed by the District Magistrate, Durg for bringing the Legal Heirs of the deceased on

record.

5. Accordingly, the writ petition deserves to be and is hereby dismissed. No order as to cost(s).