Mohamed Riyas Vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala 22 Jan 2021 Bail Application No. 7965 Of 2020 (2021) 01 KL CK 0545
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No. 7965 Of 2020

Hon'ble Bench

Ashok Menon, J

Advocates

E.A. Haris, Santhosh Peter

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred

Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 — Section 438#Indian Penal Code, 1860 — Section 34, 308, 323, 324, 326, 341

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. This is an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C.

2. The applicant is the 3rd accused in Crime No.354/2020 of Nilambur Police Station for having allegedly committed the offences punishable under

Sections 341, 323, 324, 326 and 308 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is that on 02.07.2020 at about 7.30 PM, owing to prior enmity towards the de facto complainant’s nephew named

Favad, the applicant in furtherance of common intention with the remaining accused, wrongfully restrained him and assaulted him by means of

dangerous weapons like iron pipe causing fracture to his finger and legs and thus attempted to commit culpable homicide.

4. The applicant submits that he is innocent and the allegations are not true, and therefore, seeks pre-arrest bail.

5. Heard the learned Counsel for the applicant and the learned Public Prosecutor.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor points out that the applicant is a person having criminal antecedents and moreover he should have to be subjected to

interrogation for the purpose of recovery and hence he may not be granted anticipatory bail.

7. After having heard the submissions on both sides and on perusal of the records, I find that this is not a fit case for granting the exceptional remedy

of anticipatory bail. Therefore, the application is disposed of with a direction to the applicant to surrender before the investigating officer within two

weeks. In the event of his being arrested, after interrogation and recovery, if any, he shall be produced before the jurisdictional court, where he is at

liberty to apply for regular bail, which shall be considered and disposed of preferably on the very same day.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More