Devendra Kumar Jain Vs VIth Additional District Judge Haridwar & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 12 Aug 2021 Writ Petition (M/S) No. 193 Of 2012 (2021) 08 UK CK 0183
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 193 Of 2012

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

Advocates

Siddhartha Singh, N.S. Pundir, Nagesh Agarwal

Final Decision

Dismissed

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. This is defendant’s petition against concurrent findings recorded by Judge, Small Causes Court, as affirmed in Revision.

2. Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that pursuant to a settlement arrived at between the parties, petitioner

has handed over possession of the premises in question to the respondent-landord.

3. Mr. Nagesh Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 3 also endorses the said statement made by Mr. Siddhartha Singh, learned

counsel for the petitioner.

4. In such view of the matter the writ petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as infructuous.

From The Blog
Delhi Businessman Loses ₹19 Crore in WhatsApp IPO Scam, Police Trace Global Syndicate
Dec
25
2025

Court News

Delhi Businessman Loses ₹19 Crore in WhatsApp IPO Scam, Police Trace Global Syndicate
Read More
Supreme Court: Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Protected by Claiming Compoundable Violations
Dec
25
2025

Court News

Supreme Court: Unauthorized Constructions Cannot Be Protected by Claiming Compoundable Violations
Read More