Harshvardhan Singh Rathore Vs Securities And Exchange Board Of India

Securities Appellate Tribunal Mumbai 28 Sep 2021 Miscellaneous Application No. 848, 849 Of 2021, Appeal No. 581 Of 2021 (2021) 09 SEBI CK 0166
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Miscellaneous Application No. 848, 849 Of 2021, Appeal No. 581 Of 2021

Hon'ble Bench

Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer; M. T. Joshi, J

Advocates

Saurabh Bacchawat, Amit Mishra, Abhiraj Arora, Rashi Dalmia, Karthik Narayan

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Securities And Exchange Board Of India Act, 1992 - Section 11(C)(3)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Tarun Agarwala, Presiding Officer

1. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated July 28, 2020 imposing a penalty of Rs. 10 lac for not responding to the summons under

Section 11(C)(3) of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. The ground urged is that the appellant was never served with the show

cause notice dated March 28, 2019. In this regard, we had directed the respondent to file a short reply with regard to the service of summons.

2. From the reply, we find that the show cause notice was sent along with the summons at the last known address i.e. the company’s address

which returned undelivered and thereafter affixation was made of the summons on May 14, 2019 at the company’s address.

3. We find that the appellant had resigned from the company in October 2012 and, therefore, the question of service being made upon the appellant by

affixation at the company’s address, thus, becomes immaterial. We are satisfied that the appellant was not served with the summons and,

therefore, the entire adjudication has proceeded ex-parte which cannot be sustained. The impugned order is accordingly set aside. The matter is

remitted to the authority to pass an order afresh after serving the show cause notice and after giving an opportunity of personal hearing in accordance

with law.

4. The appeal is allowed with no order as to costs. In this regards, the appellant will appear before the AO on October 18, 2021.

5. The present matter was heard through video conference due to Covid-19 pandemic. At this stage it is not possible to sign a copy of this order nor a

certified copy of this order could be issued by the Registry. In these circumstances, this order will be digitally signed by the Private Secretary on

behalf of the bench and all concerned parties are directed to act on the digitally signed copy of this order. Parties will act on production of a digitally

signed copy sent by fax and/or email.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More