Sonali Suman And Others Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court 5 May 2022 Criminal Writ Petition No. 821 Of 2022 (2022) 05 UK CK 0004
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Writ Petition No. 821 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Alok Kumar Verma, J

Advocates

Pooran Singh Rawat, Pratiroop Pandey

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 147, 148, 323, 504, 506
  • Constitution Of India, 1950 - Article 226

Judgement Text

Translate:

Alok Kumar Verma, J

1. This Criminal Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the impugned First

Information Report No.55 of 2022, registered with Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar.

2. Heard Mr. Pooran Singh Rawat, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, the learned AGA for the State.

3. The learned counsel for the State submitted that instructions have been received from the Investigating Officer and according to the received

instructions, the petitioners, namely Smt. Sonali Suman, Smt. Shivani Suman, Nihal Suman and Vikrant alias Dev Suman, are wanted for the offence

under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504 and 506 of IPC.

4. During the arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned

Station House Officer, Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar, the respondent no.2, and the Investigating Officer to follow the

judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, passed in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273, before

proceed to arrest the petitioners.

5. The learned counsel for the State has no objection on the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners.

6. In view of the above, this Criminal Writ Petition No.821 of 2022 is disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Transit

Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar, the respondent no.2 and the Investigating Officer to follow the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme

Court in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More