Thakur Dutt Gosain Vs State Of Uttarakhand And Others

Uttarakhand High Court 6 Jun 2022 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 238 Of 2022 (2022) 06 UK CK 0004
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition (S/B) No. 238 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Sanjaya Kumar Mishra, J; R.C. Khulbe, J

Advocates

K.K. Harbola, Vikas Pandey, D.S. Patni, Bhupendra Bisht

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

S.K. Mishra, J

1. The petitioner is a retired employee of the respondent-Corporation. His complaint is that the retirement benefits due to him have not been paid. The

benefits include gratuity and leave encashment.

2. Mr. D.S. Patni, the learned Senior counsel for the respondent-Corporation, does not actually dispute the liability. However, the learned Senior

Counsel does not, of course, agree to the exact amount due. His main contention is paucity of funds.

3. The petitioner is a retired employee and we feel that it will be unfair to deprive him of his retiral benefits. Therefore, we dispose of the writ petition

by directing the respondent No. 2, i.e. the Uttarakhand Pey Jal Sansadhan Vikas Evam Nirman Nigam, as follows:-

(i) Within a period of two months from today, the amount of gratuity shall be paid to the petitioner.

(ii) Within a period of five months from today, the amount of leave encashment shall be paid to the petitioner.

4. Urgent certified copy of this order be issued to the parties, as per Rules.

From The Blog
Case Study: How an Indian Startup Founder Incorporated in Delaware
Nov
12
2025

Court News

Case Study: How an Indian Startup Founder Incorporated in Delaware
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Nov
12
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad Rules in Favor of Woman: Tax Notice on ₹51 Lakh Property Purchase Quashed
Read More