Bharti Telemedia Ltd Vs See Media Services Pvt Ltd Ors

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal 10 Nov 2022 Broadcasting Petition No. 338 Of 2018 (2022) 11 TDSAT CK 0025
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Broadcasting Petition No. 338 Of 2018

Hon'ble Bench

Ram Krishna Gautam, Member

Advocates

Radhika Rai, Prannoy Joe Sebastian

Judgement Text

Translate:

Learned counsel for petitioner as well as respondent no. 1 is present. A time is being claimed for filing vakalatnama for and on behalf of respondent

no. 1 by this newly engaged counsel. Let vakalatnama be got filed within two weeks.

Rest of the respondents are not present, though a notice was issued. It is being said to be deliberate. A request is being made for service through

police mode.

Hence, let steps be taken, by way of affidavit, detailing police station etc. for making the service through concerned police station to respondent nos. 2

to 5. It be filed by the petitioner within two weeks. After such steps, let notice be issued through police mode to the respondent(s) fixing date for

further direction by office.

List the matter ‘for directions’ on 20.1.2023.

From The Blog
Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Wins ₹4 Crore Tax Case at ITAT Mumbai
Read More
Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Nov
07
2025

Court News

Supreme Court to Decide If Section 12AA Registration Alone Grants Trusts 80G Tax Benefits for Donors
Read More