Yeshaboina Yakaiah Yakanna Vs State Of Telangana And 3 Others

High Court For The State Of Telangana:: At Hyderabad 8 Dec 2022 Writ Petition No. 44088 Of 2022 (2022) 12 TEL CK 0022
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition No. 44088 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

K. Lakshman, J

Advocates

A Prabhakar Rao

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Act, 1977 - Section 4A(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Heard Sri A. Prahakar Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment appearing for

respondents. Perused the record.

Perusal of the record would reveal that the petitioner herein had filed an appeal under Section 4-A (2) of Telangana Assigned Lands (Prohibition of

Transfers) Act, 1977 challenging the order dated 23-11-2022 of respondent No.3 before respondent No.2 on 30-11-2022. He had also filed

Interlocutory Application seeking to suspend the said order. Respondent No.2 is not taking up the said Interlocutory Application and appeal.

On the other hand, during the pendency of the aforesaid appeal, respondentNo.4 is trying to dispossess the petitioner by fixing boundary stones,

therefore, there is urgency.

Whereas learned Assistant Government Pleader for Assignment, on instructions, would submit that respondent No.2 will consider the aforesaid appeal

and also Interlocutory Application, in accordance with law.

In view of the aforesaid submissions, more particularly, considering the submission made by the petitioner that during the pendency of the appeal under

the guise of order dated 23-11-2022 of respondent No.3, respondent No.4 is trying to dispossess the petitioner from the said property, this writ petition

is disposed of directing respondent No.2 to consider the aforesaid Interlocutory Application filed by the petitioner in the aforesaid appeal, in

accordance with law, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Respondent No.2 shall also make an endeavor to dispose of

the aforesaid appeal, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More