Adab Hussain Vs State Of Rajasthan And Others

Rajasthan High Court 3 Oct 2023 Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 1827 Of 2023 (2023) 10 RAJ CK 0007
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Appeal (SB) No. 1827 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Advocates

K.C. Panchariya, Javed Gauri, Keshar Singh

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribe (Prevention Of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(V), 14A
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 34, 307, 323, 324, 341, 354, 506, 509
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14-A SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with F.I.R. No.252/2023 registered at Police Station Ratanada, District Jodhpur for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 506, 307/34, 509 & 354 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST Court, Jodhpur, whereby, the bail application preferred under Section 439 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellant was rejected.

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that both the parties received injuries and now the injured persons have already been discharged from the hospital. There are cross-cases between the parties. The appellant is in judicial custody the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-appellant. The learned court below has grossly erred in law and facts as well in declining to release the appellant on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and also perused the material available on record.

Having regard to the entirety of facts and circumstances as available on record and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that the order rejecting the application for bail filed on behalf of the appellant, cannot be sustained and deserves to be set aside.

Consequently, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 31.08.2023 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ ST Court, Jodhpur, is set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant, Adab Hussain S/o Shri Sarfaraj Hussain arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.252/2023 registered at Police Station Ratanada, District Jodhpur shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

From The Blog
Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Madras High Court to Hear School’s Plea Against State Objection to RSS Camp on Campus
Read More
Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Feb
07
2026

Court News

Delhi High Court Quashes Ban on Medical Students’ Inter-College Migration, Calls Rule Arbitrary
Read More