Kumar Anand Upadhyay Vs State Of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court 12 Oct 2023 Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2334 Of 2023 (2023) 10 RAJ CK 0047
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2334 Of 2023

Hon'ble Bench

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

Advocates

Ranjeet Joshi, MS Bhati

Final Decision

Allowed

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 323, 341, 354, 394, 452
  • Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 438

Judgement Text

Translate:

Manoj Kumar Garg, J

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.699/2022, Police Station Subhash

Nagar, Bhilwara for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 452, 354, 394 IPC.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there case cross cases between the parties and both the parties have received injuries in the incident.

Counsel submits that this is purely a civil dispute between the parties and similarly situated co-accused namely Madan Lal, Smt. Pushpa Devi and

Rajendra Kumar have already been granted anticipatory bail by the trial court. In such circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by sending

the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion

that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Kumar Anand Upadhyay S/o Madanlal Upadhyay

in connection with FIR No.699/2022, Police Station Subhash Nagar, Bhilwara, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal

bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- along with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the

following conditions :-

(i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as

to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Questions Multiplex Food Prices: “₹100 for Water, ₹700 for Coffee”
Read More
Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Nov
05
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Upholds Landlord Heirs’ Rights, Orders Eviction of Sub-Tenants in Ownership Dispute
Read More