Sapura @ Sapira Pangi And Others Vs State Of Odisha

Orissa High Court 6 May 2024 Bail Application No. 7701 Of 2022 (2024) 05 OHC CK 0087
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Bail Application No. 7701 Of 2022

Hon'ble Bench

Sashikanta Mishra, J

Advocates

S.K.Sahu

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 353, 506
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 20(b)(ii)(c)
  • Arms Act, 1959 - Section 25

Judgement Text

Translate:

Sashikanta Mishra, J

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

2. The Petitioners have filed Vakalatnamas in favour of Mr. Subrat Kumar Sahu, Advocate. All the Petitioners have submitted prisoners petitions duly

countersigned by the Senior Superintendent, Circle Jail, Koraput, indicating that they desire to engage Mr. Sahu as their counsel. As such, the

Vakalalatnamas be kept on record. The name of Mr. S.K.Sahu be reflected in the cause list.

3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.

4. The Petitioners are in custody since 16.5.2022 in connection with Mathili P.S. Case No.103/2022 corresponding to G.R. Case No.84/2022 pending

in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri, for the alleged commission of the offence under Sections

147/148/323/353/506/149 of I.P.C. read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the N.D.P.S Act read with Section 25 of the Arms Act.

5. It is alleged by the prosecution that several persons were detected while carrying contraband ganja near a jungle. They were walking one after the

other forming a chain with suspicious looking packets hanging from sides from a wooden stick. Eight persons were apprehended including the present

Petitioners while others manage to flee. It is submitted that there is no clear-cut proof regarding seizure of the contraband from the possession of the

Petitioners. Learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that despite being in custody for two years, trial has not commenced as yet, which amounts to

pre-trial punishment.

6. Looking at the huge quantity of contraband seized from the possession of the Petitioners, while not being inclined to consider grant of regular bail,

this Court however, taking note of the fact the Petitioners have been in custody for 2 years without commencement of trial, deems it proper to dispose

of the bail application by directing the Court below to release them on interim bail for a period of three months from the date of their actual release on

such terms and conditions as may be fixed by the Court below including the condition that they shall not misuse the liberty granted to them.

7. After expiry of the aforesaid period of three months, the Petitioners shall surrender before the Court below, failing which appropriate warrant may

be issued for their production.

8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

....…………………………….

From The Blog
Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Nov
11
2025

Court News

Supreme Court Quashes Bihar’s Mutation Rule: Property Sale Registration Cannot Be Blocked by Extra Conditions
Read More
How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Nov
11
2025

Court News

How Indians Can Start a Company in the USA: Step-by-Step Guide, Costs, and Legal Requirements
Read More