Salman Miya Vs State of UP & Ors

National Green Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi 31 May 2024 Original Application No. 97 Of 2022 (I.A. No. 77, 268, 639 Of 2023, 230 Of 2024 (2024) 05 NGT CK 0040
Bench: Division Bench
Result Published

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Original Application No. 97 Of 2022 (I.A. No. 77, 268, 639 Of 2023, 230 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Sudhir Agarwal, JM; Dr. Afroz Ahmad, EM

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Judgement Text

Translate:

Original Application No. 97/2022

1. Pursuant  to  order  dated  24.05.2024  Uttar  Pradesh  Pollution Control Board (hereinafter referred to as ‘UPPCB’) has filed an Additional Report reiterating that out of 65 industries inspected only 6 are non-compliant. However, Learned Amicus Curiae has filed a compliance report dated 28.05.2024 giving a list of 17 such industries which are non-compliant.

2. Shri Pradeep Mishra, Learned Counsel appearing for UPPCB stated that he has not received copy of such report.

3. Learned Amicus Curiae is required to supply copy of this compliance report to all the Respondents including Shri Pradeep Mishra, Learned Counsel appearing for UPPCB.

4. They may file objections, if any, within one month.

5. List this matter on 22.07.2024.

I.A. No. 639 of 2023

6. Learned Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 9 stated that he wants an amendment in the written statement but when we pointed out that what he is seeking basically an addition of certain facts in the written statement, he said that he may be allowed to withdrawn this IA with liberty to file an additional reply.

7. Request is allowed. I.A. is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid liberty.

I.A. No. 77 of 2023

8. Learned Counsel appearing for the Applicant stated that against imposition of environmental compensation she may avail the remedy as available in law and present IA is not being pressed.

9. The IA is accordingly dismissed as not pressed of with liberty to Applicant to avail such remedy as available in law.

I.A. No. 268 of 2023

10. Applicant is seeking his impleadment in place of Respondent No. 7. We do not find any justification to change the Respondent since the matter of ownership is not to be decided by us. However, we allow the applicant, Rohit Wason, plot no. G-54, Industrial Area Phase-I, Massori Gulavti Road, Dasna, District Hapur, Uttar Pradesh to be impleaded as Respondent No. 13.

11. The Registry shall amend the Memo of Parties accordingly.

12. I.A. stands disposed of.

13. Newly impleaded Respondent stated that he has already filed reply representing himself as Respondent No. 7. He is permitted to make necessary correction in the reply with regard to description of Respondent.

I.A. No. 230 of 2024

14. This  application  has  been  filed  on  behalf  of  Respondent  No.  6 stating that he has complied with all the requirement of law and has also paid penalty of Rs. 6,90,000/-, therefore, he may be allowed to run its industry.

15. Shri Pradeep Mishra, Learned Counsel appearing for UPPCB prays for and allowed one month time to file objection, if any, to this application and also to verify the facts.

16. List this IA on 22.07.2024.

From The Blog
Delhi High Court Grants Default Bail: Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Notice Violates Article 21
Dec
15
2025

Court News

Delhi High Court Grants Default Bail: Extension of NDPS Investigation Without Notice Violates Article 21
Read More
Madras High Court: Honour Killing Still Plagues Society, Bail Must Be Rare in Grave Offences
Dec
15
2025

Court News

Madras High Court: Honour Killing Still Plagues Society, Bail Must Be Rare in Grave Offences
Read More