Dish Tv India Ltd Vs Broadcast Initiatives Ltd

Telecom Disputes Settlement And Appellate Tribunal 18 Jul 2024 Broadcasting Petition No. 355 Of 2017 (2024) 07 TDSAT CK 0016
Bench: Single Bench

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Broadcasting Petition No. 355 Of 2017

Hon'ble Bench

Ram Krishna Gautam, Member

Advocates

Jaydeep Roy, Kavya Singh, Randeep Dahiya

Judgement Text

Translate:

1. Case taken up. Learned Counsel for one of the Directors, Mr Deepak Sharma, as well as Petitioner, are present. Rest of the two Directors who

had taken time for filing reply two times, are neither present, nor being represented by any Counsel.

2. Though, there had been Bailable Warrant issued against them, and in response to same, one Director Mr. Deepak Sharma, had appeared and rest

two had claimed for time. But, the Police Report reveals, that those two Directors were neither served with Warrant, nor their warrant Bonds are

there. They are not traceable at given address.

3. Learned Counsel for Petitioner is requesting for a short time for collecting the update address and taking steps. Though, it was mentioned by him

that it is a deliberate avoidance by those two Directors, but, anyway service is to be there.

4. If there is deliberate avoidance, then it may be brought on record, by oath, with categorical assertion of the address of those Directors, to be correct

one and update. Let it be filed, within three weeks.

5. List the matter on 07.10.2024 “for further directionsâ€​.

From The Blog
Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Rejects NALSA Appeal Filed Sans Convict Consent
Read More
Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Oct
30
2025

Story

Supreme Court Raps Insurers for Technical Appeals in Claims
Read More