Betal Singh Vs Commissioner & Others

Uttarakhand High Court 8 Oct 2024 Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2779 Of 2024 (2024) 10 UK CK 0032
Bench: Single Bench
Result Published
Acts Referenced

Judgement Snapshot

Case Number

Writ Petition Miscellaneous Single No. 2779 Of 2024

Hon'ble Bench

Pankaj Purohit, J

Advocates

Shivam Rana, Mohit Maulekhi

Final Decision

Disposed Of

Acts Referred
  • Central Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017 - Section 30(2)

Judgement Text

Translate:

Pankaj Purohit, J

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned order for rejection of Application for revocation of Cancellation of GST

Registration dated 16.03.2024 (Annexure No.4).

3. Petitioner is engaged in the business of contract in the name of ‘Betal Singh Rawat’. Petitioner’s firm is registered under the Central

Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short “the CGST Act, 2017â€​).

4. The registration of the petitioner has been cancelled by respondent vide order dated 09.05.2023 for non-filing of the GST return for a continuous

period of six months.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that now the petitioner is ready to make the payment towards GST returns for a period of six months as

well as the penalty and interest, if any, imposed by the respondent-department.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that identical controversy has been decided by this Court in WPMS No.2285 of 2024.

7. The said submission of learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by learned State Counsel.

8. In view of the consensus between the parties, since the matter is covered by the order passed in WPMS No.2285 of 2024, the present writ petition

is also decided in terms of the said order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to move an application for revocation or cancellation of the order under

Section 30(2) of the CGST Act, 2017, within two weeks.

9. With this application, the petitioner shall also furnish all the GST returns, which he failed to submit and would also deposit the outstanding dues of

tax, interest and penalty of the goods and service tax, if any, along with his application. If he makes such an application within stipulated period, the

Competent Authority shall consider petitioner’s application and pass appropriate order as per law, within four weeks thereafter.

10. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

11. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

From The Blog
J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Dec
08
2025

Court News

J&K High Court: Dealer and Manufacturer Jointly Liable for Car Defects Reported Within Warranty Period
Read More
ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Dec
08
2025

Court News

ITAT Ahmedabad: Assessment Order Invalid Without DVO Report, Property Valuation Additions Quashed
Read More