🖨️ Print / Download PDF

Manoj Kumar Vs State Of Uttarakhand

Case No: First Bail Application No. 2090 Of 2024

Date of Decision: Nov. 7, 2024

Acts Referred: Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 — Section 3(5), 305, 317(2), 324(4), 331(4), 351(3)

Hon'ble Judges: Ravindra Maithani, J

Bench: Single Bench

Advocate: Pankaj Kumar, Rangoli Purohit

Final Decision: Allowed

Translate: English | हिन्दी | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | ಕನ್ನಡ | मराठी

Judgement

Ravindra Maithani, J

1. Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.0017 of 2024, under Sections 305, 324(4), 351(3), 3(5), 317(2) and 331(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita,

2023, Police Station Mukteshwar, District Nainital.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that co-accused, having similar role, has already been granted bail.

4. This fact is admitted by learned State Counsel.

5. Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

6. The bail application is allowed.

7. Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the

satisfaction of the court concerned.